Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 9
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 26, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Asked about the duration and city restrictions on rock chipping and blasting.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 1:55:19 →Next-door neighbors expressed severe concerns regarding 18 months of construction noise, vibration affecting remote work, toxic silica dust, and loss of privacy and light from an oversized home.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 1:56:48 →Attorney for neighboring property owners argued that the application is deficient, lacking proper analysis of rock excavation depth, noise, and microcrystalline silica dust.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 2:05:27 →Neighbor on the right shared concerns about foundation impacts on the shared rock ledge and the out-of-scale massing.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 2:05:46 →Noted that the entire hill is glacial rock and argued the proposal is visually incompatible with the quaint neighborhood character.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 2:06:55 →Expressed deep concern over severe flooding on Devonshire Road and questioned whether removing trees and expanding impervious footprint would worsen runoff.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 2:10:06 →Seconded flooding concerns on Devonshire Road and asked if the city has an overarching stormwater plan for upstream development.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 2:11:43 →Argued that placing a massive structure on top of the high point rock ledge will heighten its visual impact and warned of geological heritage loss and tree removal.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 2:12:57 →Questioned roof drainage design, stormwater calculations, backfill soil depth, and the net loss of natural groundwater absorption.
Planning - Oct 26, 2026 · 2:33:45 →